Depending of quality of life and management patients in postcholecystectomy syndrome period on the nature of access, and functional safety of the sphincter of Oddi
https://doi.org/10.31146/1682-8658-ecg-180-8-54-58
Abstract
Objective. To evaluate the results of management and the quality of life in patients with postcholecystectomy syndrome depending on the functional condition of the sphincter of Oddi and the bile outflow.
Materials and methods. Quality of life was evaluated using the SF-36 questionnaire in 68 patients 1–3 years after examination and treatment of 116 patients with postcholecystectomy syndrome. The diagnosis was established with a scoring system for the data of clinical, laboratory and instrumental methods.
The dynamics of the bile outfl ow was determined by hepatobiliary scintigraphy (HBSG) on a Segams-9100 gamma cam-era using a 99mTc-bromeside for 90 minutes with a choleretic test.
A statistical study was carried out using the Statistica 10 computer program. The relationship of the signs was deter-mined by multivariate correlation analysis, and the correlation coefficients (r) were calculated. Differences in values were consideredsignifi cant at p <0.05.
Results. Patients after transabdominal operations compared with patients after endoscopic interventions had the best values of psychological (MH) (47.0 ± 2.8 versus 41.7 ± 2.3 p = 0.03) and physical (PH) (46.5 ± 2.4 versus 45.8 ± 2.1; p> 0.05) health components. The level of role functioning (RP) and vital activity (VT) in patients with timely bile outflow was higher than in patients with the sphincter Oddi‘s insufficiency (75.0 ± 11.0 versus 33.3 ± 13.2; p = 0.006 and 71, 3 ± 3.1 versus 58.9 ± 6.5; p = 0.005, respectively). In patients with the sphincter Oddi’s insufficiency the pain factor (BP) was reduced (62.7 ± 7.4 versus 79.1 ± 6.3, p = 0.02)
Conclusion. An objective assessment of the bile outflow and a differentiated correction of functional and organic disorders improve the quality of life in patients independently of the surgical approaches.
About the Authors
M. V. RepinRussian Federation
Maksim V. Repin - Department of advanced training; Professor, MD.
614000, Perm, st. Petropavlovskaya, 26
V. Yu. Mikryukov
Russian Federation
Vyacheslav Yu. Mikryukov - surgeon.
614077, Perm, Gagarina Boulevard, 68
References
1. \1. Kovalyev A. I ., Sokolov A. A ., Akkuratova A. Y u. Postcholecystectomical syndrome: causes and tactics of surgical treatment. Novosti Khirurgii. 2011;1 (19):16–22.
2. Sandakov P. Ya., Dyachenko M. I., Samartsev V. A. Long-term results of surgical treatment of cicatricial stenosis of the large duodenal papilla. Annals of Surgery 2003. No. 1, pp. 29–31.
3. Kozlova I. V., Fedorov V. E., Graushkina E. V. Immediate results and long-term consequences of surgical treatment of gallstone disease. Bulletin of St. Petersburg State University. 2010;11(1): 100–107.
4. Sirchak E. S. Th e e ff ect of rafacholine-C on the dynamics of quality of life indicators in patients with sphincter of Oddi dysfunction after cholecystectomy. Eksp Klin Gastroenterol. 2015;(5):88.
5. Bystrov S. A. Postcholecystectomy syndrome – a new approach to prevention and treatment. Medical Almanac 2010;1 (10):142–145.
6. Ivanchenkova RA, At’kova ER. Quality of Life of Patients With Gallstone Disease and Gallbladder Cholesterosis in the Conservative and Surgical Treatment. Eksp Klin Gastroenterol. 2012;(5):46–55.
7. Ilchenko A. A. Why does cholecystectomy not always improve the quality of life? Pharmateka. 2012, No. 17, pp. 23–29.
8. Bystrovskaia EV, Il’chenko AA. Remote Results of Cholecystectomy. Eksp Klin Gastroenterol. 2008;(5):23–27.
9. Mitusheva E. I., Sayfutdinov R. G., Shaymardanov R. S., Badretdinova A. R. Changes in gepatopancreatobiliary system organs and quality of life in patients aftercholecystectomy. Kazan medical journal. 2015. Vol. 96, no. 3. pp. 348–353. doi: 10.17750/KMJ2015–348
10. Mentes B. B. Akin M., Irkorucu O. et al. Gastrointestinal quality of life in patients with symptomatic or asymptomatic cholelithiasis before and after laparoscopic cholecystectomy. Surg. Endosc. 2001, Vol. 15, no. 11, pp. 1267–1272.
11. Tanaka M. Function and dysfunction of the sphincter of Oddi. Dig. Surg. 2010. Vol.27, no. 2, pp. 94–99.
12. Lebedev SV, Eremeev AG, Tatarinov AP, Svistunov IO. Th e Role of Pathological Changes of Biliopancreatoduodenal Zone in Development of Postcholecystectomy Syndrome. Eksp Klin Gastroenterol. 2013;(11):34–37.
Review
For citations:
Repin M.V., Mikryukov V.Yu. Depending of quality of life and management patients in postcholecystectomy syndrome period on the nature of access, and functional safety of the sphincter of Oddi. Experimental and Clinical Gastroenterology. 2020;(8):54-58. (In Russ.) https://doi.org/10.31146/1682-8658-ecg-180-8-54-58