Preview

Experimental and Clinical Gastroenterology

Advanced search

Predictors of recurrence of superficial epithelial neoplasms of the colon after their endoscopic removal

https://doi.org/10.31146/1682-8658-ecg-237-5-96-102

Abstract

Based on current data on the risks of recurrence of colon epithelial neoplasms after their endoscopic removal, it is advisable to identify its predictors, which was the aim of our study. The study included 668 patients, who underwent endoscopic resection of superficial colonic epithelial neoplasms in the Nizhny Novgorod Regional Oncology Dispensary from 2012 to 2020. The study included patients who were diagnosed with large epithelial benign and malignant (with an invasion depth within the mucosa) neoplasms of the colon measuring 20 mm or more. Their average size was 35.5 ± 0.68 mm (median - 30 mm). During data analysis, we identified factors, associated with an increased risk of recurrence of epithelial neoplasms after their intraluminal endoscopic resection. First of all, these include the localization of the tumor in the descending colon and rectum, as well as its elevated flat type (type IIa according to the Paris classification). The histological type of the neoplasm - moderately differentiated adenocarcinoma, is also reliably associated with a high risk of its recurrence. The use of ESD, completed by endoscopic loop resection, increases the risk of developing a residual tumor threefold. According to our data on the absence of local relapse after the modified ESD “String-to-ring”, we consider it appropriate to further use this technique in everyday practice, especially for the removal high-risk neoplasms.

About the Authors

A. A. Mitrakov
Regional Nizhniy Novgorod State Oncological Hospital; Privolzhsky Research Medical University
Russian Federation


S. S. Pirogov
Privolzhsky Research Medical University; P.A. Hertsen Moscow Ocology Research Institute - branch of the National Medical Research Radiological Centre of the Ministry of Health of Russia
Russian Federation


V. I. Ryabtseva
P.A. Hertsen Moscow Ocology Research Institute - branch of the National Medical Research Radiological Centre of the Ministry of Health of Russia
Russian Federation


R. S. Smirnova
Regional Nizhniy Novgorod State Oncological Hospital; Privolzhsky Research Medical University
Russian Federation


References

1. Sullivan B.A., Noujaim M., Roper J. Cause, Epidemiology, and Histology of Polyps and Pathways to Colorectal Cancer. Gastrointest Endosc Clin N Am. 2022 Apr;32(2):177-194. doi: 10.1016/j.giec.2021.12.001.

2. Arminski T.C., Mclean D.W. Incidence and distribution of adenomatous polyps of the colon and rectum based on 1,000 autopsy examinations. Dis Colon Rectum. 1964 Jul-Aug;7:249-61. doi: 10.1007/BF02630528.

3. Clark J.C., Collan Y., Eide T.J. et al. Prevalence of polyps in an autopsy series from areas with varying incidence of large-bowel cancer.Int J Cancer. 1985 Aug 15;36(2):179-86. doi: 10.1002/ijc.2910360209.

4. Wong M.C.S., Huang J., Huang J.L.W. et al. Global Prevalence of Colorectal Neoplasia: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis. Clin Gastroenterol Hepatol. 2020 Mar;18(3):553-561.e10. doi: 10.1016/j.cgh.2019.07.016.

5. Kolb J.M., Hu J., DeSanto K. et al. Early-Age Onset Colorectal Neoplasia in Average-Risk Individuals Undergoing Screening Colonoscopy: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis. Gastroenterology. 2021 Oct;161(4):1145-1155.e12. doi: 10.1053/j.gastro.2021.06.006.

6. Davidson K.W., Barry M.J., Mangione C.M. et al. Screening for Colorectal Cancer: US Preventive Services Task Force Recommendation Statement. JAMA. 2021 May 18;325(19):1965-1977. doi: 10.1001/jama.2021.6238. Erratum in: JAMA. 2021 Aug 24;326(8):773. doi: 10.1001/jama.2021.12404.

7. Kuntz K.M., Lansdorp-Vogelaar I., Rutter C.M. et al. A systematic comparison of microsimulation models of colorectal cancer: the role of assumptions about adenoma progression. Med Decis Making. 2011 Jul-Aug;31(4):530-9. doi: 10.1177/0272989X11408730.

8. Dornblaser D., Young S., Shaukat A. Colon polyps: updates in classification and management. Curr Opin Gastroenterol. 2024 Jan 1;40(1):14-20. doi: 10.1097/MOG.0000000000000988.

9. Ferlitsch M., Hassan C., Bisschops R. et al. Colorectal polypectomy and endoscopic mucosal resection: European Society of Gastrointestinal Endoscopy (ESGE) Guideline - Update 2024. Endoscopy. 2024 Jul;56(7):516-545. doi: 10.1055/a-2304-3219.

10. Tanaka S., Kashida H., Saito Y. et al. Japan Gastroenterological Endoscopy Society guidelines for colorectal endoscopic submucosal dissection/endoscopic mucosal resection. Dig Endosc. 2020 Jan;32(2):219-239. doi: 10.1111/den.13545.

11. Uraoka T., Takizawa K., Tanaka S. et al. Guidelines for Colorectal Cold Polypectomy (supplement to “Guidelines for Colorectal Endoscopic Submucosal Dissection/Endoscopic Mucosal Resection”). Dig Endosc. 2022 May;34(4):668-675. doi: 10.1111/den.14250.

12. Lee H.S., Park H.W., Lee J.S. et al. Treatment outcomes and recurrence following standard cold forceps polypectomy for diminutive polyps. Surg Endosc. 2017 Jan;31(1):159-169. doi: 10.1007/s00464-016-4947-1.

13. Lee J.K., Kidambi T.D., Kaltenbach T. et al. Impact of observational training on endoscopic mucosal resection outcomes and competency for large colorectal polyps: single endoscopist experience. Endosc Int Open. 2020 Mar;8(3): E346-E353. doi: 10.1055/a-1107-2711.

14. Ferrara F., Luigiano C., Ghersi S. et al. Efficacy, safety and outcomes of ‘inject and cut’ endoscopic mucosal resection for large sessile and flat colorectal polyps. Digestion. 2010;82(4):213-20. doi: 10.1159/000284397.

15. Mahadeva S., Rembacken B.J. Standard “inject and cut” endoscopic mucosal resection technique is practical and effective in the management of superficial colorectal neoplasms. Surg Endosc. 2009 Feb;23(2):417-22. doi: 10.1007/s00464-008-9983-z.

16. Rotermund C., Djinbachian R., Taghiakbari M. et al. Recurrence rates after endoscopic resection of large colorectal polyps: A systematic review and meta-analysis. World J Gastroenterol. 2022 Aug 7;28(29):4007-4018. doi: 10.3748/wjg.v28.i29.4007.

17. Mitrakov A.A., Pirogov S.S., Mitrakova N.N. et al. “String-to-ring” traction technique for endoscopic submocosal dissection in the treatment of rectal tumors. Experimental and Clinical Gastroenterology. 2022;(5):97-102. (In Russ.) doi: 10.31146/1682-8658-ecg201-5-97-102@@ Митраков А.А., Пирогов С.С., Митракова Н.Н., Гамаюнов С.В., Тимощенко М.В., Гагаев Р.А. Использование методики “String-to-ring” (метод «тракции через блок») при выполнении эндоскопической резекции с диссекцией в подслизистом слое эпителиальных новообразований прямой кишки. Экспериментальная и клиническая гастроэнтерология. 2022;(5):97-102. doi: 10.31146/1682-8658-ecg201-5-97-102


Review

For citations:


Mitrakov A.A., Pirogov S.S., Ryabtseva V.I., Smirnova R.S. Predictors of recurrence of superficial epithelial neoplasms of the colon after their endoscopic removal. Experimental and Clinical Gastroenterology. 2025;(5):96-102. (In Russ.) https://doi.org/10.31146/1682-8658-ecg-237-5-96-102

Views: 12


Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.


ISSN 1682-8658 (Print)