Preview

Experimental and Clinical Gastroenterology

Advanced search

COMPARATIVE ANALYSIS OF IMMEDIATE RESULTS OF LAPAROSCOPIC AND LAPAROTOMIC OF CHOLEDOCHOLITHOTOMY

Abstract

Purpose: Improve treatment outcomes in patients with cholelithiasis complicated by choledochal-tiasa, through the introduction and improvement of the videoendoscopic technology. Materials and methods: 97 patients with cholelithiasis complicated by choledocholithiasis and/or stenosing duodenal papillitis is divided into two homogeneous groups. In the main group (n=47) of the patients operated using laparoscopy, in control (n=50) - laparotomy. Results: the Average duration of surgery in both groups were not significantly different. The level of postoperative pain in patients of the main group was significantly lower than the comparison group. Light postoperative complications observed were given in 17 cases of the main group (36.2%) and in 24 patients in the control group (48.0 per cent). In 1 patient of the main group diagnosed subhepatic abscess, developed shenny by drainage under ULTRASOUND control. 3 patients of the control group, postoperative wound suppuration. In each of the groups, there was 1 case of insolvency of choledochojejunoanastomosis. Conclusions: Laparoscopic access has no effect on the duration of operation of the radio and can significantly reduce the intensity of postoperative pain. Often, the early postoperative complications after laparoscopic choledocholithotomy-MII does not exceed the frequency of complications after choledocholithotomy performed laparoscopy-volume access.

About the Authors

S. V. Tarasenko
Ryazan State Medical University
Russian Federation


O. V. Zaitsev
Ryazan State Medical University
Russian Federation


D. O. Tyulenev
Ryazan State Medical University
Russian Federation


A. A. Kopejkin
Ryazan State Medical University
Russian Federation


T. S. Rakhmaev
Ryazan State Medical University
Russian Federation


A. Yu. Bogomolov
Ryazan State Medical University
Russian Federation


References

1. Кузнецов Ю. Н. Эндохирургические технологии в лечении острого холецистопанкреатита. Рос. мед.-биол. вестн. им. акад. И. П. Павлова, 2004, № 1-2, С. 138-142

2. Натальский А.А., Тарасенко С. В., Песков О. Д. Проблема печеночной недостаточности в хирургии. Наука молодых (Eruditio Juvenium), 2013, № 1, С. 61-73

3. DuCoin C., Moon R., Teixeira A. Laparoscopic choledochoduodenostomy as an alternate treatment for common bile duct stones after Roux-en-Y gastric bypass. Surg Obes Relat Dis, 2014, vol. 10, no.4, pp. 647-652.

4. Hawker G. et al. Measures of adult pain: Visual Analog Scale for Pain (VAS Pain), Numeric Rating Scale for Pain (NRS Pain), McGill Pain Questionnaire (MPQ), Short-Form McGill Pain Questionnaire (SF-MPQ), Chronic Pain Grade Scale (CPGS), Short Form-36 Bodily Pain Scale. Arthritis Care & Research, 2011, vol. 63, no.11, pp. 240-252.

5. Dindo D., Demartines N., Clavien P. A. Classification of surgical complications: a new proposal with evaluation in a cohort of 6336 patients and results of a survey. Ann Surg, 2004 vol. 240, no.2, pp. 205-213.

6. El Nakeeb A., Askr W., El Hanafy E. Long term outcomes of choledochoduodenostomy for common bile duct stones in the era of laparoscopy and endoscopy. Hepatogastroenterology, 2015, vol. 62, no.137, pp 6-10.

7. Yi, H., Hong G., Min S. Long-term outcome of primary closure after laparoscopic common bile duct exploration combined with choledochoscopy. Surg Laparosc Endosc Percutan Tech, 2015, vol. 25, no. 3, pp 250-253.


Review

For citations:


Tarasenko S.V., Zaitsev O.V., Tyulenev D.O., Kopejkin A.A., Rakhmaev T.S., Bogomolov A.Yu. COMPARATIVE ANALYSIS OF IMMEDIATE RESULTS OF LAPAROSCOPIC AND LAPAROTOMIC OF CHOLEDOCHOLITHOTOMY. Experimental and Clinical Gastroenterology. 2018;(4):60-65. (In Russ.)

Views: 248


Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.


ISSN 1682-8658 (Print)