Preview

Experimental and Clinical Gastroenterology

Advanced search

Prognostic significance of mucosal transformation factors in patients with Barrett’s esophagus

https://doi.org/10.31146/1682-8658-ecg-213-5-45-58

Abstract

Relevance: PB is a dynamic state, regression and progression of the disease are possible in the same patient against the background of a long period of observation. Materials and methods. The study was conducted on the basis of the MMC BR in Moscow in the period from 2013 to 2023, both retrospectively and prospectively. The diagnosis of BE was established on the basis of the endoscopic picture (according to the Prague criteria) and the data of the morphological study of the biopsy material. As a result of the analysis, 122 patients were selected who were on inpatient and outpatient treatment, as well as dynamic observation. Examination of patients included: clinical data with an assessment of comorbid pathology, endoscopic examination with sampling of biopsy material, morphological, including immunohistochemical studies of biopsy material: determination of mutations in the P53, P63 genes and the nuclear proliferation marker Ki-67. The treatment was carried out in accordance with the clinical recommendations of the Russian Gastroenterological Association based on the developed algorithm and included conservative therapy for BE and identified comorbid pathology, as well as in groups of patients with low-grade dysplasia, endoscopic intraluminal treatment-argon plasma coagulation. Results. Analysis of the results made it possible to conclude that the applied algorithm was highly effective: high scores on the goal achievement scale were achieved in 88% of patients. Moreover, the greatest success was achieved in groups with low-grade dysplasia due to the use of personalized methods of treating patients with BE based on a deep clinical and morphological analysis, including, in addition to generally accepted, gender and age characteristics, assessment of comorbid pathology and the dynamics of P53, P63 and Ki-67 in determining the timing of dynamic follow-up of patients.

About the Authors

G. V. Belova
Federal Center for Brain and Neurotechnologies of the Federal Medical and Biological Agency of Russia; A.I. Yevdokimov Moscow State University of Medicine and Dentistry
Russian Federation


O. S. Utkina
Multidisciplinary Medical Center of the Bank of Russia
Russian Federation


References

1. Belova G.V. [Methodological aspects of diagnosis, monitoring and treatment of patients with Barrett’s esophagus]. Diss… doctor of medical sciences. Moscow. 2009. 240 p. (in Russ.)@@ Белова Г. В. Методологические аспекты диагностики, мониторинга и лечения пациентов с пищеводом Баррета. Дис…докт.мед.наук. ФГУ «МНИОИ им. П. А. Герцена Росмедтехнологии» М, - 2009. 240 с.

2. Gogello E.A., Gallinger Yu. A. Barrett’s esophagus, adenocarcinoma of the esophagus and the tasks of modern gastroenterology.Russian Journal of Gastroenterology, Hepatology, Coloproctology. 2001;(6):71-75. (in Russ.)@@ Годжелло Э. А., Галлингер Ю. А. Пищевод Баррета, аденокарцинома пищевода и задачи современной гастроэнтерологии // Российский журнал гастроэнтерологии, гепатологии, колопроктологии. 2001;(6):71-75.

3. Sharma P., Hawes R. H., Bansal A. et al. Standard endoscopy with random biopsies versus narrow band imaging targeted biopsies in Barrett’s oesophagus: a prospective, international, randomised controlled trial. Gut. 2013 Jan;62(1):15-21. doi: 10.1136/gutjnl-2011-300962.

4. Zayratiants O. V., Maev I. V., Smolyannikova V. A. et al. [Pathological anatomy of Barrett’s esophagus]. Archive of Pathology. 2011;(3):21-26. (in Russ.)@@ Зайратьянц О. В., Маев И. В., Смольянникова В. А. и соавторы. Патологическая анатомия пищевода Баррета. Архив патологии. 2011;(3):21-26.

5. Ivashkin V.T., Maev I. V., Trukhmanov A. S. et al. [Barrett’s esophagus. Clinical guidelines]. Moscow. 2014. (in Russ.)@@ Ивашкин В. Т., Маев И. В., Трухманов А. С. и др. «Пищевод Баррета» Клинические рекомендации. 2014, Москва.

6. Efremov L. I., Komissarenko I. A. Metabolic continuum and polymorbidity in geriatrics. Eksp Klin gastroenterol. 2014;(6):4-7. (in Russ.)@@ Ефремов Л. И., Комиссаренко И. А. Метаболический континум и полиморбидность в гериатрии. Экспериментальная и клиническая гастроэнтерология. 2014;(6):4-7.

7. Roitberg G. E. Metabolic syndrome. Moscow. Medpress-inform, 2007, 223 p. (in Russ.)@@ Метаболический синдром. Под ред. Г. Е. Ройтберга / М.: Медпресс-информ, 2007;223 с.

8. Fonseca V. Metabolic syndrome. Transl. from English. Moscow. “Praktika” Publ., 2011, 272 p. (in Russ.)@@ Метаболический синдром. Под ред. В. Фонсеки. Пер.с англ. -М.: «Практика», 2011. 272 с.

9. Hoyo C., Сook M. B., Kamangar F. et al. Body mass index in relation to oesophageal and oesophagogastric junction adenocarcinomas: a pooled analysis from the International BEACON Consortium.Int J Epidemiol. 2012 Dec;41(6):1706-18. doi: 10.1093/ije/dys176.

10. Singh S., Sharma A. N., Murad M. H., et al. Central adiposity is associated with increased risk of esophageal inflammation, metaplasia, and adenocarcinoma: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Clin Gastroenterol Hepatol. 2013 Nov;11(11):1399-1412.e7. doi: 10.1016/j.cgh.2013.05.009.


Review

For citations:


Belova G.V., Utkina O.S. Prognostic significance of mucosal transformation factors in patients with Barrett’s esophagus. Experimental and Clinical Gastroenterology. 2023;(5):45-58. (In Russ.) https://doi.org/10.31146/1682-8658-ecg-213-5-45-58

Views: 91


Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.


ISSN 1682-8658 (Print)