Predictors of complicated course of perioperative period in patients with rectal cancer and rectosigmoid junction
https://doi.org/10.31146/1682-8658-ecg-206-10-77-85
Abstract
Aim of the investigation. Evaluation of significance of a number of clinical predictors of complicated course of perioperative period in patients with rectal cancer and rectosigmoid junction. Materials and Methods. Retrospective analysis of 170 patients with rectal cancer or rectosigmoid junction. Patients with adenocarcinoma of rectum or rectosigmoid junction which were operated in combination to partial or total mesorectumectomy were included to the study. In all cases an anastomosis was formed. There were 54.7% of men and 45.3% of women. The mean age of the patients was 63 years. Preoperative treatment was performed in 54 patients. Influence of various factors (gender, age, BMI, anatomical risk factors, neoadjuvant therapy, type of operation, ligation level of the inferior mesenteric artery, forced mobilization of the splenic flexure of the colon, surgical access, anastomosis type, anastomosis protection, duration of operation, preventive stoma) on the risk of perioperative complications and separately inconsistent anastomosis suture was estimated. Results. Neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy increases the risk of intraoperative complications by 3.4 times. Risk of anastomosis inconsistency is 3,35 times increased in men, 2,6 times for forced mobilization of the splenic flexure of the large intestine and 10 times for intraoperative perforation of the large intestine. Predictors of complicated course of the postoperative period are adhesions, narrow pelvis, short mesentery of the sigmoid colon, dolichosygma (p<0,05). Conclusion. Presence of the above risk factors must lead to application of measures on prevention and elimination of consequences of perioperative complications.
About the Authors
E. P. Kulikov
Ryazan State Medical University
Russian Federation
Russian Federation
S. A. Mertsalov
Ryazan State Medical University
Russian Federation
Russian Federation
N. I. Verkin
Regional clinical oncological dispensary
Russian Federation
Russian Federation
Yu. D. Kaminskiy
Ryazan State Medical University
Russian Federation
Russian Federation
I. S. Pikushin
Ryazan State Medical University
Russian Federation
Russian Federation
References
1. Kaprin A. D. Malignant neoplasms in Russia in 2020 (morbidity and mortality) / Ed. HELL. Kaprina, V. V. Starinsky, A. O. Shakhzadova Moscow. MNIOI them. P. A. Herzen - branch of the Federal State Budgetary Institution «NMITs Radiology» of the Ministry of Health of Russia Publ., 2021. 252 P. (in Russ.)@@ Каприн А. Д. Злокачественные новообразования в России в 2020 году (заболеваемость и смертность)/ Под ред. А. Д. Каприна, В. В. Старинского, А. О. Шахзадовой - М.: МНИОИ им. П. А. Герцена - филиал ФГБУ «НМИЦ радиологии» Минздрава России, - 2021. - илл. - 252
2. Kulikov E. P., Kaminsky Y. D., Klevcova S. V. Surgical correction of functional disorders in performing sphincterosafing operations for rectal cancer (literature review). I. P. Pavlov Russian Medical Biological Herald. 2017;25(4):642-654. doi: 10.23888/PAVLOVJ20174642-654.@@ Куликов, Е. П. Хирургическая коррекция функциональных нарушений при выполнении сфинктеросохранных операций по поводу рака прямой кишки / Е. П. Куликов, Ю. Д. Каминский, С. В. Клевцова // Российский медико-биологический вестник имени академика И. П. Павлова. - 2017. - Т. 25. - № 4. - С. 642-654. DOI 10.23888/PAVLOVJ20174642-654.
3. Nikolaeva A.O., Danilov M. A., Atroshchenko A. O. Science of the young (eruditio juvenium). 2020;8(1):106-15. (in Russ.) doi: 10.23888/HMJ202081106-115.@@ Николаева, А. О. Оценка факторов риска развития несостоятельности межкишечных анастомозов: обзор литературы / А. О. Николаева, М. А. Данилов, А. О. Атрощенко // Наука молодых (Eruditio Juvenium). - 2020. - Т. 8. - № 1. - С. 106-115. - DOI 10.23888/HMJ202081106-115.
4. Kulikov E. P., Kaminsky Yu.D., Klevtsova S. V., Nosov S. A., Kholchev M. Yu., Aristarkhov V. G., Mertsalov S. A. Prevention of colorectal anastomotic leakage in patients with rectal cancer. Pirogov Russian Journal of Surgery = Khirurgiya. Zurnal im. N. I. Pirogova. 2019;(11):64-68. (In Russ.). doi: 10.17116/hirurgia201911164.@@ Профилактика несостоятельности швов колоректального анастомоза у больных раком прямой кишки / Е. П. Куликов, Ю. Д. Каминский, С. В. Клевцова [и др.] // Хирургия. Журнал им. Н. И. Пирогова. - 2019. - № 11. - С. 64-68. - DOI: 10.17116/hirurgia201911164.
5. Kulchiev А. A., Morozov А. A., Perisaeva E. A., Кarsanova Z. O., Kozaeva Ya. Ya.Complications in colorectal surgery: risk factors. Chief Physician of the South of Russia. 2020. № 5 (75): 48-50. (in Russ.) @@ Кульчиев А. А., Морозов А. А., Перисаева Э. А., Карсанова З. О., Козаева Я. Я. Осложнения в колоректальной хирургии: факторы риска. Главврач Юга России. 2020. № 5 (75). URL: https://cyberleninka.ru/article/n/oslozhneniya-v-kolorektalnoy-hirurgii-faktory-riska
6. Khalfallah M, Dougaz W, Jerraya H, Nouira R, Bouasker I, Dziri C. Prognostic factors in rectal cancer: where is the evidence? Tunis Med. 2017 Feb;95(2):79-86. PMID: 29424864.
7. Lee M.J., Vaughan-Shaw P., Vimalachandran D.; ACPGBI GI Recovery Group. A systematic review and meta-analysis of baseline risk factors for the development of postoperative ileus in patients undergoing gastrointestinal surgery. Ann R Coll Surg Engl. 2020 Mar;102(3):194-203. doi: 10.1308/rcsann.2019.0158.
8. Nisar P.J., Lavery I. C., Kiran R. P. Influence of neoadjuvant radiotherapy on anastomotic leak after restorative resection for rectal cancer. J Gastrointest Surg. 2012 Sep;16(9):1750-7. doi: 10.1007/s11605-012-1936-0.
9. Overbey D.M., Cowan M. L., Hosokawa P. W., Chapman B. C., Vogel J. D. Laparoscopic colectomy in obese patients: a comparison of laparoscopic and hand-assisted laparoscopic techniques. Surg Endosc. 2017 Oct;31(10):3912-3921. doi: 10.1007/s00464-017-5422-3.
10. Shalaby M., Di Lorenzo N., Franceschilli L., Perrone F., Angelucci G. P., Quareisma S., Gaspari A. L., Sileri P. Outcome of Colorectal Surgery in Elderly Populations. Ann Coloproctol. 2016 Aug;32(4):139-43. doi: 10.3393/ac.2016.32.4.139.
11. McDermott F.D., Heeney A., Kelly M. E. Systematic review of preoperative, intraoperative and postoperative risk factors for colorectal anastomotic leaks. Br. J. Surg. 2015; 102 (5): 462-479. doi: 10.1002/bjs.969.
12. Rutkowski A., Olesiński T., Zając L., Bednarczyk M., Szpakowski M. The risk of anastomotic leakage after anterior resection: retrospective analysis of 501 rectal cancer patients operated without protective stoma. Minerva Chir. 2017 Dec;72(6):491-498. doi: 10.23736/S0026-4733.17.07411-9.
13. Lim S.-B., Yu C. S., Kim C. W., et al. Late anastomotic leakage after low anterior resection in rectal cancer patients: clinical characteristics and predisposing factors. Colorectal Disease. 2016;18:135-140.
14. Darbishgadjiev Sh.O., Baulin A. A., Ivacheva N. A., Kalentev V. V., Baulina N. V. Rol’ urovnya formirovaniya kolorektal’nogo anastomoza v razvitii nesostoyatel’nosti i puti uluchsheniya rezul’tatov khirurgicheskogo lecheniya raka pryamoy kishki [The role of colorectal anastomosis level formation in its failure and ways to improve the results of surgical treatment of colorectal cancer]. Journal of New Medical Technologies. 2020;1:21-25. (in Russ.) doi: 10.24411/1609-2163-2020-16478.@@ Роль уровня формирования колоректального анастомоза в развитии несостоятельности и пути улучшения результатов хирургического лечения рака прямой кишки / Ш. О. Дарбишгаджиев, А. А. Баулин, Н. А. Ивачева [и др.] // Вестник новых медицинских технологий. - 2020. - Т. 27. - № 1. - С. 21-25. - DOI 10.24411/1609-2163-2020-16478.
15. Dmitriev A. V., Khoronko Yu.V., Pereskokov S. V., Groshilin V. S., Kozyrevskiy M. A., Afunts L. S., Kuznecov I. I.Comparative evaluation of direct results of low anterior rectal resection with total mesorectumectomy using laparoscopic and laparotomic methods. Experimental and Clinical Gastroenterology. 2020;(12):31-37. (In Russ.) doi: 10.31146/1682-8658-ecg-184-12-31-37.@@ Сравнительная оценка непосредственных результатов низкой передней резекции прямой кишки с тотальной мезоректумэктомией лапароскопическим и лапаротомным способом / А. В. Дмитриев, Ю. В. Хоронько, С. В. Перескоков [и др.] // Экспериментальная и клиническая гастроэнтерология. - 2020. - № 12(184). - С. 31-37. - DOI 10.31146/1682-8658-ecg-184-12-31-37.
16. Nafedzov I. O., Chernyshov S. V., Ponomarenko A. A., Fomenko O. Yu., Alekseev M. V., Khomyakov E. A., Belousova S. V., Rybakov E. G. Rehabilitation of patients with low anterior resection syndrome. Koloproktologia. 2021;20(2):57-64. (in Russ.) doi: 10.33878/2073-7556-2021-20-2-57-64.@@ Реабилитация пациентов с синдромом низкой передней резекции / И. О. Нафедзов, С. В. Чернышов, А. А. Пономаренко [и др.] // Колопроктология. - 2021. - Т. 20. - № 2(76). - С. 57-64. - DOI 10.33878/2073-7556-2021-20-2-57-64.
17. Natroshvili I. G., Baichorov E. H., Prudkov M. I., Shulutko A. M. Application of the integral complications severity index for optimization of surgical treatment for acute cholecystitis of mild and moderate severity. Medical News of North Caucasus. 2019;14(2):312-316. (In Russ.) doi: 10.14300/mnnc.2019.14075.@@ Применение интегрального индекса тяжести осложнений для оптимизации хирургического лечения острого холецистита легкой и средней степени тяжести /И.Г. Натрошвили, Э. Х. Байчоров, М. И. Прудков, А. М. Шулутко // Медицинский вестник Северного Кавказа. 2019 № 2.
Review
For citations:
Kulikov E.P., Mertsalov S.A., Verkin N.I., Kaminskiy Yu.D., Pikushin I.S. Predictors of complicated course of perioperative period in patients with rectal cancer and rectosigmoid junction. Experimental and Clinical Gastroenterology. 2022;(10):77-85. (In Russ.) https://doi.org/10.31146/1682-8658-ecg-206-10-77-85
Views:
316
Email this article 