Preview

Experimental and Clinical Gastroenterology

Advanced search

Dynamic changes in the liver fibrosis marker FIB-4 as a predictor of adverse cardiovascular events in patients with high and very high cardiovascular risk

https://doi.org/10.31146/1682-8658-ecg-206-10-43-49

Abstract

The aim of the study was to assess the prognostic significance of dynamic changes in the surrogate noninvasive liver fibrosis marker FIB-4 in relation to the development of adverse cardiovascular events in patients with high and very high cardiovascular risk (CVR). Materials and Methods. Men and women aged 40-67 years with high and very high CVR were included in the study. Fibrosis-4 index (FIB-4) was used as a noninvasive marker of liver fibrosis. The combined end point was death from cardiovascular causes, nonfatal myocardial infarction, nonfatal stroke, and coronary revascularization. Results. 105 patients with high and very high CVR were included in the study. The duration of the follow-up period was 34.6 (15.0; 52.3) months. Events constituting the combined end point occurred in 26 (24.7%) patients. During the follow-up period, FIB-4 index values of <1.45 (0.90 (0.68; 1.23) at study inclusion changed to ≥1.45 (1.66 (1.61; 1.90) in 13 (12.4%) patients. Over the follow-up period, the median FIB-4 change was -23.0% (-1.81; 11.5) and by the end of the follow-up period, the median FIB-4 values were 1.17 (0.97; 1.47). According to Kaplan-Meier analysis, the cumulative risk of events constituting the combined end point was found to be significantly higher in patients with an increase in FIB-4. By Cox single-factor regression analysis, an increase in FIB-4 (from values <1.45 to ≥1.45) was associated with a 4.42-fold increase in the relative risk (RR) of events constituting the combined end point (95% CI 1.33-14.7; p=0.015). Conclusion. In patients with high and very high CVR over 40 years of age, an increase in FIB-4 liver fibrosis index from values <1.45 to ≥1.45 during 2.8 years of follow-up was associated with a 4.42-fold increase in the RR of adverse cardiovascular events (95% CI 1.33-14.7; p=0.015).

About the Authors

A. S. Kuznetsova
Federal State Budgetary Educational Institution of Higher Education “South-Ural State Medical University” of the Ministry of Healthcare of the Russian Federation
Russian Federation


A. I. Dolgushina
Federal State Budgetary Educational Institution of Higher Education “South-Ural State Medical University” of the Ministry of Healthcare of the Russian Federation
Russian Federation


Ya. I. Kudrinskaya
Federal State Budgetary Educational Institution of Higher Education “South-Ural State Medical University” of the Ministry of Healthcare of the Russian Federation
Russian Federation


A. A. Selyanina
Federal State Budgetary Educational Institution of Higher Education “South-Ural State Medical University” of the Ministry of Healthcare of the Russian Federation
Russian Federation


G. M. Khusainova
Federal State Budgetary Educational Institution of Higher Education “South-Ural State Medical University” of the Ministry of Healthcare of the Russian Federation
Russian Federation


V. V. Genkel
Federal State Budgetary Educational Institution of Higher Education “South-Ural State Medical University” of the Ministry of Healthcare of the Russian Federation
Russian Federation


References

1. Mitra S, De A, Chowdhury A. Epidemiology of non-alcoholic and alcoholic fatty liver diseases. Transl Gastroenterol Hepatol. 2019;5:16. doi: 10.21037/tgh.2019.09.08.

2. Ge X, Zheng L, Wang M, Du Y et al. Prevalence trends in non-alcoholic fatty liver disease at the global, regional and national levels, 1990-2017: a population-based observational study. BMJ Open. 2020;10(8): e036663. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2019-036663.

3. Pavlov Ch.S., Kuznetsova Ye.A., Shulpekova Yu.O., Semenistaya M. Ch. Non-alcoholic fatty liver disease. Patogenez (Pathogenesis). 2018;16(2):4-11 (In Russ.) doi: 10.25557/2310-0435.2018.02.4-11.@@ Павлов Ч. С., Кузнецова Е. А., Шульпекова Ю. О., Семенистая М. Ч. Неалкогольная жировая болезнь печени. Патогенез. 2018;16(2):4-11. doi: 10.25557/2310-0435.2018.02.4-11.

4. Lazebnik L. B., Radchenko V. G., Dzhadhav S. N., Sitkin S. I. et al. Systemic inflammation and non-alcoholic fatty liver disease. Experimental and Clinical Gastroenterology. 2019;165(5):29-41. (In Russ.) doi: 10.31146/1682-8658-ecg-165-5-29-41.@@ Лазебник Л. Б., Радченко В. Г., Джадхав С. Н., Ситкин С. И. и др. Системное воспаление и неалкогольная жировая болезнь печени. Экспериментальная и клиническая гастроэнтерология. 2019;5(165):29-41. doi: 10.31146/1682-8658-ecg-165-5-29-41.

5. Maevskaya M.V., Ivashkin V. T., Ivashkin K. V., Lunkov V. D., et al. Non-alcoholic fatty liver disease as a cause and consequence of cardio-metabolic complications. Role of the ursodeoxicholic acid in the pharmacotherapy. Therapeutic Archive. 2019;91(2):109-117 (In Russ.) doi: 10.26442/00403660.2019.02.000122.@@ Маевская М. В., Ивашкин В. Т., Ивашкин К. В., Луньков В. Д. и др. Неалкогольная жировая болезнь печени как причина и следствие кардиометаболических осложнений. Особенности фармакотерапии. Место урсодезоксихолевой кислоты. Терапевтический архив. 2019;91(2):109-117. doi: 10.26442/00403660.2019.02.000122.

6. Angelico F, Baratta F, Pastori D, Ben MD. Assessment of hepatic fibrosis in MAFLD: A new player in the evaluation of residual cardiovascular risk? Dig Liver Dis. 2021;53(3):383-384. doi: 10.1016/j.dld.2020.12.123.

7. Ostovaneh MR, Ambale-Venkatesh B, Fuji T, Bakhshi H et al. Association of Liver Fibrosis With Cardiovascular Diseases in the General Population: The Multi-Ethnic Study of Atherosclerosis (MESA). Circ Cardiovasc Imaging. 2018;11(3): e007241. doi: 10.1161/CIRCIMAGING.

8. Schonmann Y, Yeshua H, Bentov I, Zelber-Sagi S. Liver fibrosis marker is an independent predictor of cardiovascular morbidity and mortality in the general population. Dig Liver Dis. 2021;53(1):79-85. doi: 10.1016/j.dld.2020.10.014.

9. Simon TG, Corey KE, Cannon CP, Blazing M et al. The nonalcoholic fatty liver disease (NAFLD) fibrosis score, cardiovascular risk stratification and a strategy for secondary prevention with ezetimibe.Int J Cardiol. 2018;270:245-252. doi: 10.1016/j.ijcard.2018.05.087.

10. Ballestri S, Mantovani A, Baldelli E, Lugari S et al. Liver Fibrosis Biomarkers Accurately Exclude Advanced Fibrosis and Are Associated with Higher Cardiovascular Risk Scores in Patients with NAFLD or Viral Chronic Liver Disease. Diagnostics (Basel). 2021;11(1):98. doi: 10.3390/diagnostics11010098.

11. Fandler-Höfler S, Stauber RE, Kneihsl M, Wünsch G et al. Non-invasive markers of liver fibrosis and outcome in large vessel occlusion stroke. Ther Adv Neurol Disord. 2021;14:17562864211037239. doi: 10.1177/17562864211037239.

12. Mach F, Baigent C, Catapano AL, Koskinas KC et al. 2019 ESC/EAS Guidelines for the management of dyslipidaemias: lipid modification to reduce cardiovascular risk. Eur Heart J. 2020;41(1):111-188. doi: 10.1093/eurheartj/ehz455.

13. European Association for Study of Liver; Asociacion Latinoamericana para el Estudio del Higado. EASL-ALEH Clinical Practice Guidelines: Non-invasive tests for evaluation of liver disease severity and prognosis. J Hepatol. 2015;63(1):237-64. doi: 10.1016/j.jhep.2015.04.006.

14. Hudson M., Sheron N., Rowe I. A., Hirschfield G. M. Should we screen for cirrhosis? BMJ. 2017;358: j3233. doi: 10.1136/bmj.j3233.

15. Sheptulina A.F., Shirokova Ye.N., Ivashkin V. T. Oninvasive diagnostic methods of liver fibrosis in patients with primary biliary cirrhosis and primary sclerosing cholangitis: role of indirect serological markers.Russian Journal of Gastroenterology, Hepatology, Coloproctology. 2016;26(3):52-63. (In Russ.) doi: 10.22416/1382-4376-2016-26-3-52-63.@@ Шептулина А. Ф., Широкова Е. Н., Ивашкин В. Т. Неинвазивные методы диагностики фиброза печени у больных первичным билиарным циррозом и первичным склерозирующим холангитом: роль непрямых сывороточных маркёров. Российский журнал гастроэнтерологии, гепатологии, колопроктологии. 2016;26(3):52-63. doi: 10.22416/1382-4376-2016-26-3-52-63.

16. Saleem N., Miller L. S., Dadabhai A. S., Cartwright E. J. Using vibration controlled transient elastography and FIB-4 to assess liver cirrhosis in a hepatitis C virus infected population. Medicine (Baltimore). 2021;11;100(23): e26200. doi: 10.1097/MD.0000000000026200.

17. Park HJ, Park JY, Jung SM, Song JJ et al. Fibrosis-4 index at diagnosis is associated with all-cause mortality in patients with microscopic polyangiitis and granulomatosis with polyangiitis. BMC Gastroenterol. 2019;19(1):90. doi: 10.1186/s12876-019-1007-z.

18. Xiang F, Sun J, Chen PH, Han P et al. Early Elevation of Fibrosis-4 Liver Fibrosis Score Is Associated With Adverse Outcomes Among Patients With Coronavirus Disease 2019. Clin Infect Dis. 2021;73(3): e594-e601. doi: 10.1093/cid/ciaa1710.

19. So-Armah K.A., Lim J. K., Lo Re V., Tate J. P., et al. FIB-4 stage of liver fibrosis predicts incident heart failure among HIV-infected and uninfected patients. Hepatology. 2017;66(4):1286-1295. doi: 10.1002/hep.29285.

20. Kasper P., Martin A., Lang S., Kütting F., et al. NAFLD and cardiovascular diseases: a clinical review. Clin Res Cardiol. 2021;110(7):921-937. doi: 10.1007/s00392-020-01709-7.

21. Kim S. U., Kim B. K., Park J. Y., Kim D. Y., et al. Fibrosis-4 index at diagnosis can predict all-cause mortality in patients with rheumatoid arthritis: A retrospective monocentric study. Mod. Rheumatol. 2020;30:70-77. doi: 10.1080/14397595.2018.1558760.

22. Sato Y., Yoshihisa A., Kanno Y., Watanabe S., et al. Liver stiffness assessed by Fibrosis-4 index predicts mortality in patients with heart failure. Open Heart. 2017;4: e000598. doi: 10.1136/openhrt-2017-000598.

23. Chen K., Sng W. K., Quah J. H., Liu J., et al. Clinical spectrum of non-alcoholic fatty liver disease in patients with diabetes mellitus. PLoS One. 2020;15(8): e0236977. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0236977.

24. Del Ben M., Baratta F., Pastori D., Angelico F. The challenge of cardiovascular prevention in NAFLD. Lancet Gastroenterol Hepatol. 2021;6(11):877-878. doi: 10.1016/S2468-1253(21)00337-X.

25. Lee J., Kim H. S., Cho Y. K., Kim E. H., et al. Association between noninvasive assessment of liver fibrosis and coronary artery calcification progression in patients with nonalcoholic fatty liver disease. Sci Rep. 2020;10(1):18323. doi: 10.1038/s41598-020-75266-4.

26. Lee H. H., Cho Y., Choi Y. J., Huh B. W., et al. Non-alcoholic steatohepatitis and progression of carotid atherosclerosis in patients with type 2 diabetes: a Korean cohort study. Cardiovasc Diabetol. 2020;19(1):81. doi: 10.1186/s12933-020-01064-x.

27. Wu Y., Cao Y., Xu K., Zhu Y., et al. Dynamically remodeled hepatic extracellular matrix predicts prognosis of early-stage cirrhosis. Cell Death Dis. 2021;12(2):163. doi:10.1038/s41419-021-03443-y.

28. Toyoda H., Tada T., Yasuda S., Mizuno K., et al. Dynamic Evaluation of Liver Fibrosis to Assess the Risk of Hepatocellular Carcinoma in Patients With Chronic Hepatitis C Who Achieved Sustained Virologic Response. Clin Infect Dis. 2020;70(6):1208-1214. doi:10.1093/cid/ciz359.

29. Lonardo A., Nascimbeni F., Ballestri S., Fairweather D., et al. Sex Differences in Nonalcoholic Fatty Liver Disease: State of the Art and Identification of Research Gaps. Hepatology. 2019;70(4):1457-1469. doi: 10.1002/hep.30626.

30. Rigamonti C., Andorno S., Maduli E., Capelli F., et al. Gender and liver fibrosis in chronic hepatitis: the role of iron status. Aliment Pharmacol Ther. 2005;21(12):1445-51. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2036.2005.02517.x.


Review

For citations:


Kuznetsova A.S., Dolgushina A.I., Kudrinskaya Ya.I., Selyanina A.A., Khusainova G.M., Genkel V.V. Dynamic changes in the liver fibrosis marker FIB-4 as a predictor of adverse cardiovascular events in patients with high and very high cardiovascular risk. Experimental and Clinical Gastroenterology. 2022;(10):43-49. (In Russ.) https://doi.org/10.31146/1682-8658-ecg-206-10-43-49

Views: 529


Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.


ISSN 1682-8658 (Print)