Some features of the pathogenetic mechanisms of the development of acute adhesive small bowel obstruction
https://doi.org/10.31146/1682-8658-ecg-200-4-126-130
Abstract
Aim. To study the pathogenetic mechanisms of the development of acute adhesive small bowel obstruction.
Material and methods. An analysis is given of the results of a comprehensive examination of 50 patients with acute adhesive small bowel obstruction. In 46 (92%) observations out of 50 (100%) patients, the causes of acute adhesive small bowel obstruction were various pathologies of the abdominal cavity organs, which had a history of diff erent types of surgery and volume of surgical interventions, and in 4 (8%) cases it was primary, without carrying out surgical interventions.
Results. The results of the study showed a signifi cant decrease in the level of serotonin in biopsies of the mucous membrane of the small intestine and in the blood serum with the progression of oxidative stress and cytokine activity in patients with acute adhesive small bowel obstruction, who had a history of various surgical interventions on the abdominal and pelvic organs, and there were also infl ammatory processes in the small intestine. This leads to disruption of the motor function of the small intestine, the development of intestinal paresis. Depending on the extent of the lesion and the occurrence of pathomorphological changes in the walls of the small intestine, single or multiple viscero- visceral and viscero- parietal adhesions are subsequently formed with the development of acute adhesive small bowel obstruction.
Conclusion. Thus, in the pathogenesis of acute adhesive small bowel obstruction, the leading place is given to a decrease in the number and qualitative composition of EC-cells of the small intestine mucosa producing serotonin due to oxidative stress and cytokine activity.
About the Authors
M. K. Gulov
Avicenna Tajik State Medical University
Tajikistan
Tajikistan
Mahmadshoh K. Gulov MD, Professor, Department of General Surgery № 1
Rudaki Avenue, 139, Dushanbe, 734003
B. I. Safarov
Avicenna Tajik State Medical University
Tajikistan
Tajikistan
Behruz I. Safarov, Applicant, Department of General Surgery № 1
Rudaki Avenue, 139, Dushanbe, 734003
K. R. Ruziboyzoda
Avicenna Tajik State Medical University
Tajikistan
Tajikistan
Kahramon R. Ruziboyzoda, Ph.D., Associate Professor of the Department of Surgical Diseases № 1
Rudaki Avenue, 139, Dushanbe, 734003
References
1. Altiev B.K., Atadzhanov Sh.K., Isabaev Sh. B. Problems of diagnosis and treatment of acute adhesive intestinal obstruction. Vestn. Emergency medicine. 2010;1:88–92.
2. Pugaev A.B., Negrebov M. G., Achkasov E. E., Aleksandrov L. B., Ba M. R., Andreichikov A. A. Morphological changes in the small intestine in acute strangulation of small intestine mechanical obstruction. Clinical medicine. 2015;4:56–61. (in Russ.)
3. Khadzhibaev A.M., Khodzhimuhamedova N. A., Khadzhibaev F. A. Diagnosis and treatment of intestinal obstruction. Kazan medical journal. 2013; 94 (3): 377–381. (in Russ.)
4. Meier R.P. de Saussure W. O., Orci L. A. Clinical outcome in acute small bowel obstruction aft er surgical or conservative management. World J. Surg. 2014;38(12):3082–3088. doi: 10.1007/s00268–014–2733–6.
5. Dibirov M.D., Rodionov I. E., Kakubava M. R., Yuanov A. A., Ramazanova Yu.I., Ashimova A. A. Correction of intra- abdominal hypertension and microcirculation in patients with acute intestinal obstruction of senile age. Moscow surgical journal. 2012; 3 (25): 9–14. (in Russ.)
6. Byrne J., Saleh F., Ambrosini L., Quereshy F., Jackson T. D., Okrainec A. Laparoscopic versus open surgical management of adhesive small bowel obstruction: a comparison of outcomes. Surg. Endosc. 2015;29:2525–2532. doi: 10.1007/s00464–014–4015–7.
7. Sheyanov S. D. Kharitonova E. A., Zukhraeva Z. I. Dia gnosis of acute adhesive intestinal obstruction by measuring intra- abdominal pressure. Bulletin of surgery named aft er I. I. Grecov. 2012; 171 (5): 24–30. (in Russ.)
8. Kurbonov K.M., Dzhonov B. N. Modern technologies in the diagnosis and treatment of adhesive intestinal obstruction. Aviсennа Bulletin. 2012;4:35–38. (in Russ.)
9. Kurbonov K.M., Nazirboev K. R., Yorov S. K. Korrektsiya sindroma enteral’noy nedostatochnosti u bol’nykh rasprostranennym peritonitom [Correction of the syndrome of enteric insuffi ciency in patients with widespread peritonitis. Postgraduate education bulletin in health care. 2017,1: 38–42. (in Russ.)
10. Almabaev Y.A., Seifuldinova M. A., Akzholova N. A. Experience of using laparoscopic adhesiolysis in experiment. Problems of modern science and education. 2017;14(96):111–114. (in Russ.)
11. Back J.H., Cho W. J., Kim J. H. Kwon1 Application of hyaluronic acid/sodium alginate- based microparticles to prevent tissue adhesion in a rabbit model. Surg. Today. 2016; 46:501–8. doi: 10.1007/s00595–015–1186–3.
12. Hellebrekers, B.W.J., Kooistra Т. Pathogenesis of postoperative adhesion formation. Br. J. Surg. 2011;98:1503–16. doi: 10.1002/bjs.7657.
13. Boimurodov O.S., Yorov Y. B., Gaziev Z. Kh., Toshev Sh.A. A case of successful treatment of acute adhesive small bowel obstruction using minimally invasive technology. Aviсennа Bulletin. 2017; 4: 556–570. (in Russ.)
14. Vlasov A.P., Sarayev V. V., Shibitov V. A., Abroskin B. V., Vlasov P. A., Abroskin B. V. Optimization of surgical treatment of acute intestinal obstruction. Medical almanac.
15. ; 5 (29): 135–138. (in Russ.)
16. Zhang Y., Liu Q., Yang N. Hyaluronic acid and oxidized regenerated cellulose prevent adhesion reformation after adhesiolysis in rat models. Drug Des. Develop. Th er. 2016;10:3501–7. doi: 10.2147/DDDT.S103824.
Review
For citations:
Gulov M.K., Safarov B.I., Ruziboyzoda K.R. Some features of the pathogenetic mechanisms of the development of acute adhesive small bowel obstruction. Experimental and Clinical Gastroenterology. 2022;(4):126-130. (In Russ.) https://doi.org/10.31146/1682-8658-ecg-200-4-126-130
Views:
218
Email this article 