Preview

Experimental and Clinical Gastroenterology

Advanced search

Modified technique of tumor traction in endoscopic submucosal dissections in the stomach (ex vivo study)

https://doi.org/10.31146/1682-8658-ecg-201-5-64-70

Abstract

Background: the method of endoscopic submucosal dissection (ESD) allows to remove large neoplasms of the GI tract enblock, which significantly reduces the risk of local tumor recurrence. However, ESD method is technically complicated with high risk of surgical complications.
Aim: to modify ESD traction technique and evaluate its efficiency.
Materials and methods: experimental comparative study on biological preparations (pig stomachs). 144 ESD with three different methods were performed: the 1st group—standard ESD method (n-48); the 2nd—ESD with the method of traction with the clip and thread (n-48); the 3rd—ESD with a modified method of tumor traction (n-48).
Results: the shortest time to submucosal dissection was 4.89 min [2–12] in the 3rd group, and 13,27 [4–31] min and 9,37 [4–26] min in the 1st and 2nd, respectively (p = 0,05). Total operative time in the 3rd was 21,10 [12–31] min, in the 1st 23.85 [12–48] min, and in the 2nd—25.56 [13–49] min, p = 0.002. The max dissection speed was 0.48 [0.20–1.27] (min/cm2) in the 3rd group, 0.94 [0.47–2.06] (min/cm2) and 1.48 [0.56–4.10] (min/cm2) in the 2nd and 3rd, respectively, p=0.003. HM0 was 89.6% [43/48] in group 1, 93.7% [45/48] in the 2nd, and 100% [48/48] in the 3rd, p>0.05. Muscle layer damage during submucosal dissection was 25% [12/48] in the 1st, 6.25% [3/48] in the 2nd and 12.5% [6/48] in 3rd, p=0.389.
Conclusion: the modified traction method during endoscopic submucosal dissection allows to visualize submucosa layer better, to increase dissection speed thus reducing total time of the operation and time of submucosal dissection.

About the Authors

A. N. Verbovsky
М. F. Vladimirsky Moscow Regional Research and Clinical Institute
Russian Federation

Alexander N. Verbovsky, Head of Endoscopy unit

129110, Moscow, st. Shchepkina, build. 61/2, building 1



S. S. Pirogov
P. A. Hertzen Moscow Oncology Research Institute
Russian Federation

Sergey S. Pirogov, MD, PhD, Head of Endoscopic Department

125284, Moscow, 2nd Botkinsky pr., build. 3



E. S. Vakurova
М. F. Vladimirsky Moscow Regional Research and Clinical Institute
Russian Federation

Elena S. Vakurova, PhD, Head of Endoscopy Department

129110, Moscow, st. Shchepkina, build. 61/2, building 1



A. V. Semenkov
М. F. Vladimirsky Moscow Regional Research and Clinical Institute
Russian Federation

Alexey V. Semenkov, MD, PhD, Head of the Department of Oncologic Surgery; professor of the Department of oncology

129110, Moscow, st. Shchepkina, build. 61/2, building 1



G. R. Setdikova
М. F. Vladimirsky Moscow Regional Research and Clinical Institute
Russian Federation

Galiya R. Setdikova, MD, PhD, Head of the Department of Morphological Diagnostics of the Department of Oncology

129110, Moscow, st. Shchepkina, build. 61/2, building 1



A. S. Balalykin
М. F. Vladimirsky Moscow Regional Research and Clinical Institute
Russian Federation

Alexey S. Balalykin, MD, PhD, professor, professor of the Department of Surgery

129110, Moscow, st. Shchepkina, build. 61/2, building 1



References

1. Gotoda T., Kondo H., Ono H., et al. A new endoscopic mucosal resection procedure using an insulation-tipped electrosurgical knife for rectal flat lesions: report of two cases. Gastrointest Endosc. 1999;50(4):560–563. doi:10.1016/s0016–5107(99)70084–2

2. Pimentel-Nunes P., Mourão F., Veloso N., et al. Longterm follow-up after endoscopic resection of gastric superficial neoplastic lesions in Portugal. Endoscopy. 2014;46(11):933–940. doi:10.1055/s-0034–1377348

3. Nishizawa T., Yahagi N. Endoscopic mucosal resection and endoscopic submucosal dissection: technique and new directions. Curr Opin Gastroenterol. 2017;33(5):315–319. doi:10.1097/MOG.0000000000000388

4. Yoshida M., Takizawa K., Suzuki S., et al. Conventional versus traction-assisted endoscopic submucosal dissection for gastric neoplasms: a multicenter, randomized controlled trial (with video). Gastrointest Endosc. 2018;87(5):1231–1240. doi:10.1016/j.gie.2017.11.031

5. Suzuki Y., Tanuma T., Nojima M., et al. Comparison of dissection speed during colorectal ESD between the novel Multiloop (M-loop) traction method and ESD methods without traction. Endosc Int Open. 2020;8(7): E840-E847. doi:10.1055/a-1161–8596

6. Nagata M. Internal traction method using a springand-loop with clip (S-O clip) allows countertraction in gastric endoscopic submucosal dissection. Surg Endosc. 2020;34(8):3722–3733. doi:10.1007/s00464–020–07590–9

7. Dobashi A., Storm A. C., Wong Kee Song L. M., et al. An internal magnet traction device reduces procedure time for endoscopic submucosal dissection by expert and non-expert endoscopists: ex vivo study in a porcine colorectal model (with video). Surg Endosc. 2019;33(8):2696–2703. doi:10.1007/s00464–019–06817–8

8. Yamasaki Y., Takeuchi Y., Uedo N., et al. Efficacy of traction-assisted colorectal endoscopic submucosal dissection using a clip-and-thread technique: A prospective randomized study. Dig Endosc. 2018;30(4):467–476. doi:10.1111/den.13036

9. Oyama T. Counter traction makes endoscopic submucosal dissection easier. Clin Endosc. 2012;45(4):375–378. doi:10.5946/ce.2012.45.4.375

10. Li C.H., Chen P. J., Chu H. C., et al. Endoscopic submucosal dissection with the pulley method for earlystage gastric cancer (with video). Gastrointest Endosc. 2011;73(1):163–167. doi:10.1016/j.gie.2010.08.041

11. He Y., Fu K., Leung J., et al. Traction with dental floss and endoscopic clip improves trainee success in performing gastric endoscopic submucosal dissection (ESD): a live porcine study (with video). Surg Endosc. 2016;30(7):3138–3144. doi:10.1007/s00464–015–4598–7


Review

For citations:


Verbovsky A.N., Pirogov S.S., Vakurova E.S., Semenkov A.V., Setdikova G.R., Balalykin A.S. Modified technique of tumor traction in endoscopic submucosal dissections in the stomach (ex vivo study). Experimental and Clinical Gastroenterology. 2022;(5):64-70. (In Russ.) https://doi.org/10.31146/1682-8658-ecg-201-5-64-70

Views: 362


Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.


ISSN 1682-8658 (Print)