Evaluation of the influence of methods of sanitation of the common bile duct on the course of the postoperative period of endoscopic papillosphincterotomy
https://doi.org/10.31146/1682-8658-ecg-201-5-27-31
Abstract
Gallstone disease continues to occupy a leading position in terms of the number of surgical interventions in modern emergency surgery.
The purpose of our study is to determine the risks of developing post-manipulation pancreatitis depending on the method of sanitation of the choledochus, to determine the dynamics of regression of hyperamylasemia and hyperbilirubinemia in patients after endoscopic papillosphincterotomy (EPST), to assess long-term results—the frequency of repeated hospitalizations and the need to perform surgical interventions for restenosis of the papilla.
Materials and methods: a prospective analysis of 60 clinical cases of patients after EPST was performed. Patients were divided into 2 groups depending on the method of sanation of the common choledochus. The frequency of development of an increase in the level of blood amylase and bilirubin and the timing of regression of these indicators were assessed. An analysis was also made of repeated cases of hospitalizations and the need for interventions on the papilla.
Results: the development of hyperamylasemia in the group of revision of the choledochus occurred in 23% of cases, in the group without mechanical sanitation — in 13%. Hyperbilirubinemia in the immediate postoperative period developed in 27 and 23% of cases, respectively. The terms of regression of elevated biochemical parameters were higher in the group of patients with a mechanical method of sanation of the common choledochus.
Conclusion: mechanical methods of sanation of the common choledochus can increase the incidence of post-manipulation complications after EPST and increase the recovery time for normal values of biochemical parameters. To assess the longterm results of the development of papillary restonosis after EPST, it is necessary to form larger groups of patients with the possibility of conducting a multicenter study.
About the Authors
S. A. May
Novokuznetsk City Clinical Hospital № 29
Russian Federation
Russian Federation
Semyon A. May, doctor of the endoscopy department
654038, Novokuznetsk, Soviet Army Avenue, build.49
A. G. Korotkevich
Novokuznetsk City Clinical Hospital № 29; Novokuznetsk State Institute for Further Training of Physicians — Branch Campus of the Federal State Budgetary Educational Institution of Further Professional Education “Russian Medical Academy of Continuous Professional Education” of the Ministry of Healthcare of the Russian Federation
Russian Federation
Russian Federation
Aleksey G. Korotkevich, Professor, Head of the Department of Endoscopy
654038, Novokuznetsk, Soviet Army Avenue, build.49
654005, Novokuznetsk, Prospekt Stroiteley, build.5
I. V. Savostyanov
Novokuznetsk City Clinical Hospital № 29; Novokuznetsk State Institute for Further Training of Physicians — Branch Campus of the Federal State Budgetary Educational Institution of Further Professional Education “Russian Medical Academy of Continuous Professional Education” of the Ministry of Healthcare of the Russian Federation
Russian Federation
Russian Federation
Ilya V. Savostyanov, doctor of the endoscopy department; Postgraduate Student, Department of Surgery, Urology, Endoscopy and pediatric surgery
654038, Novokuznetsk, Soviet Army Avenue, build.49
654005, Novokuznetsk, Prospekt Stroiteley, build.5
References
1. Merzlikin N. V. et al. Treatment methods for choledocholithiasis. Bulletin of Siberian Medicine. 2015;14(4):99–109. (in Russ.)
2. Cianci P., Restini E. Management of cholelithiasis with choledocholithiasis: Endoscopic and surgical approaches. World Journal of Gastroenterology. 2021;27(28):4536.
3. Shumatov V. B. et al. Minimally invasive interventions in the complex treatment of obstructive jaundice. Pacific Medical Journal. 2011: 4 (46): 47–48.
4. Zagidullina G. T., Kurbangaleev A. I. Treatment of choledocholithiasis and its complications using endosurgical technologies. Practical medicine. 2016;1 (96):82–89. (in Russ.)
5. Archibugi L. et al. Needle-knife fistulotomy vs. standard biliary sphincterotomy for choledocholithiasis: common bile duct stone recurrence and complication rate. Endoscopy International Open. 2019;7(12): E1733-E1741.
6. Gusev A. V., Borovkov I. N., Arutyunyan S. A. Analysis of the effectiveness of various options for endoscopic papillosphincterotomy in obstructive jaundice. Bulletin of new medical technologies. 2012;19(3):40–43. (in Russ.)
7. Gandhi D., et al. A pictorial review of gall stones and its associated complications. Clinical Imaging. 2020;60(2):228–236.
8. Shapovalyants S. G., et al. Recurrent choledocholithiasis diagnosis, prevention and treatment. Experimental and clinical gastroenterology. 2012:(4):32–38. (in Russ.)
9. Tarasenko S. V., et al. The prevalence of complicated forms of gallstone disease. Science of the Young–EruditioJuvenium. 2018;6(2):218–224. (in Russ.)
10. Cianci P., Restini E. Management of cholelithiasis with choledocholithiasis: Endoscopic and surgical approaches. World Journal of Gastroenterology. 2021;27(28):4536.
11. Trukhan D. I., Viktorova I. A. Diseases of the gallbladder and biliary tract in the practice of a first contact doctor. Passive waiting or active observation? Medicaladvice. 2016;(14):109–115. (in Russ.)
12. Mai S.A. et al. Tactics and methods of sanitation of the common choledochus aft er papillotomy. Experimental and clinical gastroenterology. 2021;1(5):49–56. (in Russ.)
13. Hollenbach M., Hoffmeister A. Adverse events in endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreaticography (ERCP): Focus on post-ERCP-pancreatitis. United European gastroenterology journal. 2022;10(1):10.
Review
For citations:
May S.A., Korotkevich A.G., Savostyanov I.V. Evaluation of the influence of methods of sanitation of the common bile duct on the course of the postoperative period of endoscopic papillosphincterotomy. Experimental and Clinical Gastroenterology. 2022;(5):27-31. (In Russ.) https://doi.org/10.31146/1682-8658-ecg-201-5-27-31
Views:
179
Email this article 