Type II achalasia. What can be hidden behind panesophageal pressurization?
https://doi.org/10.31146/1682-8658-ecg-183-11-39-43
Abstract
The aim was to investigate features of manometric pattern of type II achalasia.
Materials and methods: High-resolution esophgeal manometry (HRM) was performed in 250 patients with achalasia. In 154 cases patients underwent peroral esophageal myotomy (POEM).
Results: We found that poor results after POEM showed patients with high preoperative esophageal pressurization (>80 mm Hg). The poorest result after POEM we observed in patient with short additional increase of panesophageal pressure (up to 95 mm Hg) withing the contour of panesophageal pressurization.
About the Authors
A. A. Smirnov
Federal state budgetary educational institution of higher education “First Pavlov State Medical University of St. Petersburg”
Russian Federation
Russian Federation
Alexander A. Smirnov, Cand. of Med. Sci., Associate Professor, head of the endoscopy department
St. Petersburg
M. M. Kiriltseva
Federal state budgetary educational institution of higher education “First Pavlov State Medical University of St. Petersburg”
Russian Federation
Russian Federation
Maya M. Kiriltseva, endoscopist
St. Petersburg
M. E. Lubchenko
Federal state budgetary educational institution of higher education “First Pavlov State Medical University of St. Petersburg”
Russian Federation
Russian Federation
Maria E. Lubchenko, endoscopist
St. Petersburg
References
1. Ivashkin V. T., Trukhmanov A. S., Godzhello E. A., Mayev I. V., Evsyutina Y. V., Lapina T. L., Storonova O. A. Diagnostics and treatment of cardiac achalasia and cardiospasm: guidelines of the Russian gastroenterological association. Russian Journal of Gastroenterology, Hepatology, Coloproctology. 2016;26(4):36–54. (In Russ.) https://doi.org/10.22416/1382–4376–2016–26–4–36–54
2. Members C, Kahrilas PJ, Bredenoord AJ, et al. Chicago Claffication v3.0. 2016;27(2):160–174.
3. Alderliesten J, Conchillo JM, Leeuwenburgh I, Steyerberg EW, Kuipers EJ. Predictors for outcome of failure of balloon dilatation in patients with achalasia. Gut. 2011;60(1):10–16.
4. Pratap N, Kalapala R, Darisetty S, et al. Achalasia cardia subtyping by high-resolution manometry predicts the therapeutic outcome of pneumatic balloon dilatation. J Neurogastroenterol Motil. 2011;17(1):48–53.
5. Chandrasekhara V, Desilets D, Falk GW, et al. The American society for gastrointestinal endoscopy PIVI (Preservation and Incorporation of Valuable Endoscopic Innovations) on peroral endoscopic myotomy. Gastrointest Endosc. 2015;81(5):1087–1100.e1.
6. Hungness ES, Teitelbaum EN, Santos BF, et al. Comparison of Perioperative Outcomes Between Peroral Esophageal Myotomy (POEM) and Laparoscopic Heller Myotomy. J Gastrointest Surg. 2013;17(2):228–235.
7. Martins RK, Ribeiro IB, Turiani D, et al. Peroral (POEM) or surgical myotomy for the treatment of achalasia: a systematic review and meta-analysis. 2020:1–8.
8. Kahrilas PJ, Bredenoord AJ, Fox M, et al. Expert consensus document: Advances in the management of oesophageal motility disorders in the era of high-resolution manometry: A focus on Achalasia syndromes. Nat Rev Gastroenterol Hepatol. 2017;14(11):677–688.
9. Woalder. HHS Public Access. Physiol Behav. 2017;176(1):139–148.
10. Rohof WO, Salvador R, Annese V, et al. Outcomes of treatment for achalasia depend on manometric subtype. Gastroenterology. 2013;144(4):718–725.
11. Salvador R, Costantini M, Zaninotto G, et al. The Preoperative Manometric Pattern Predicts the Outcome of Surgical Treatment for Esophageal Achalasia. J Gastrointest Surg. 2010;14(11):1635–1645.
12. Kim WH, Cho JY, Ko WJ, et al. Comparison of the outcomes of peroral endoscopic myotomy for Achalasia according to manometric subtype. Gut Liver. 2017;11(5):642–647.
13. Kane ED, Budhraja V, Desilets DJ, Romanelli JR. Myotomy length informed by high-resolution esophageal manometry (HREM) results in improved per-oral endoscopic myotomy (POEM) outcomes for type III achalasia. Surg Endosc. 2019;33(3):886–894.
14. Pandolfino JE, Gawron AJ. Achalasia: A systematic review. JAMA – J Am Med Assoc. 2015;313(18):1841–1852.
15. Mittal RK. Regulation and dysregulation of esophageal peristalsis by the integrated function of circular and longitudinal muscle layers in health and disease. Am J Physiol – Gastrointest Liver Physiol. 2016;311(3): G431-G443.
16. Park S, Zifan A, Kumar D, Mittal RK. Genesis of Esophageal Pressurization and Bolus Flow Patterns in Patients With Achalasia Esophagus. Gastroenterology. 2018;155(2):327–336.
17. Sodikoff JB, Lo AA, Shetuni BB, Kahrilas PJ, Yang GY, Pandolfino JE. Histopathologic patterns among achalasia subtypes. Neurogastroenterol Motil. 2016;28(1):139–145.
18. Salvador R, Voltarel G, Savarino E, et al. The natural history of achalasia: Evidence of a continuum “The evolutive pattern theory.” Dig Liver Dis. 2018.
19. Schizas D, Theochari NA, Katsaros I, et al. Pseudoachalasia: a systematic review of the literature. Esophagus. 2020;(0123456789).
Review
For citations:
Smirnov A.A., Kiriltseva M.M., Lubchenko M.E. Type II achalasia. What can be hidden behind panesophageal pressurization? Experimental and Clinical Gastroenterology. 2020;183(11):39-43. (In Russ.) https://doi.org/10.31146/1682-8658-ecg-183-11-39-43
Views:
521
Email this article 