Preview

Experimental and Clinical Gastroenterology

Advanced search

SCREENING OF GASTROESOPHAGEAL REFLUX DISEASE BASED ON THE SIZE OF THE GASTRIC GAS BUBBLE

Abstract

Objective: to determine the possibility of screening for gastroesophageal reflux disease (GERD) by size and shape of the stomach gas bubble on the direct X-ray of the chest and abdomen. Methods and results. One hundred seventy-five radiographs of patients of different ages were analyzed by the random sampling method. The shape of the stomach gas bubble (SGB) was determined and its width and height were measured. Results. SGB was detected in all pediatric patients. It was absent in 18% of adults (16-64 years) and in 25% of the patients aged 65 years and older. In majority of patients fundus had a shape of a dome with the level of liquid content. In 6% of patients the SBG was deformed with an angular protrusion in the shape of the «bird beak» pointing in the direction of the spine. The more advanced was the age of a patient the more increase in volume of SBG we observed in the sagittal plane. In the direct projection, age had no significant influence on the average size of the SGB (except without SGB). There was a significant increase in the width of GBS in older children (7-15 years) compared to children aged 1-6 years. In adults, there was a tendency to have smaller width and height of SBG (P> 0.1). In elderly, we found a significant decrease in these parameters. Discussion. The size of the dome of SGB, which is a «trap» for the air, depends on the stability of its walls. In GERD the intraperitoneal portion of the lower esophageal sphincter is weakened and is opened either temporarily under the pressure, or permanently. In such cases, the dome is deformed with the formation of a corner protrusions, and reduced in size. Conclussion. The absence of GBS, or the decrease of its size, or the angular protrusion of its inner wall on the x-ray suggest the possibility of GERD. Further research is needed to determine the normal width and height of GBS.

About the Authors

M. D. Levin
State geriatric center
Russian Federation


I. G. Jin
Republican scientific and practical center of children’s surgery
Russian Federation


References

1. Pounderoux P, Ergun G.A, Lin S, et al. Esophageal bolus transit imaged by ultrafast computerized tomography. Gastroenterology. 1996 May;110(5):1422-8.

2. Holloway R.H, Hongo M, Berger K, Mc Callum R.W. Gastric distention: a mechanism for postprandial gastroesophageal reflux. Gastroenterology. 1985 Oct;89(4):779-84.

3. Scheffer R.C, Akkermans L.M, Bais J.E, et al. Elicitation of transient lower oesophageal sphincter relaxations in response to gastric distension and meal ingestion. Neurogastroenterol Motil. 2002 Dec;14(6):647-55.

4. Enzmann D.R, Harell G.S, Zboralske F.F. Upper esophageal responses to intraluminal distention in man. Gastroenterology. 1977 Jun;72(6):1292-8.

5. Bredenoord A.J, Weusten BLAM, Sufrim D, et al. Aerophagia? Gastric? And supragastric belching: a study using intraluminal electrical impedance monitoring. Gut. 2004 Nov;53(11):1561-5.

6. Bredenoord A.J, Weusten BLAM, Timmer R, et al. Relationships between air swallowing, intragastric air, belching and gastro-oesophageal teflux. Neurogastroenterol Motil. 2005 Jun;17(3):341-7.

7. Watanabe T, Urita Y, Maeda T, et al. Changes in a gastric air bubble linked to gastroesophageal reflux symptoms. J Breath Res. 2008 Sep;2(3):037024. doi: 10.1088/1752-7155/2/3/037024. Epub 2008 Sep 8.

8. Watanabe T, Urita Y, Maeda T, et al. Form of gastric air bubble is associated with gastroesophageal reflux symptoms. Hepatogastroenterology. 2009 Sep-Oct;56(94-95):1566-70.

9. Левин М.Д., Хомич В. М., Налибоцкий Б. В. О возможности рентгендиагностики острого аппендицита у детей. Клин Хирургия. 1989. - № 6.-с.38-40.

10. Левин М. Д. Рентгенологическая диагностика острой кишечной непроходимости у детей. Здравоохранение Белоруссии. - 1987. - № 12. - с. 11-15

11. Isolauri J., Laippala P. Prevalence of symptoms suggestive of gastroesophageal reflux disease in an adult population. Ann Med. 1995. - № 27. -P. 67-70.

12. Karamanolis G.,Kotsalidis G., Triantafyllou K., et al. Yield of Combined Impedance-pH Monitoring for Refractory Reflux Symptoms in Clinical PracticeNeurogastroenterol Motil. 2011. - Vol.17, № 2. - P. 158-163.

13. Shaker R, Dodds W.J, Kahrilas P.J, et al. Relationship of intraluminal pH and pressure within the lower esophageal sphincter. Am J Gastroenterol. 1991 Jul;86(7):812-6.

14. Ackermann C., Rothenbhler J.M., Martinoli S., Muller C. Esophagealmanometry prior to and following anti-reflux surgery. Schweiz. Med. Wochenschr.1991; 121 (21): 797-800.

15. Peng L, Patel A, Kushnir V, Gyawali C.P. Assessment of Upper Esophageal Sphincter Function onHigh-resolution Manometry: Identification of Predictors of Globus Symptoms. J Clin Gastroenterol. 2014 Jan 31. [Epub ahead of print].

16. Vegesna A.K, Sloan J.A, Singh B, et al. Characterization of the distal esophagus high-pressure zone with manometry, ultrasound and micro-computed tomography. Neurogastroenterol Motil. 2013 Jan;25(1):53-60.e6. doi: 10.1111/nmo.12010. Epub 2012 Sep 24.


Review

For citations:


Levin M.D., Jin I.G. SCREENING OF GASTROESOPHAGEAL REFLUX DISEASE BASED ON THE SIZE OF THE GASTRIC GAS BUBBLE. Experimental and Clinical Gastroenterology. 2018;(4):23-29. (In Russ.)

Views: 231


Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.


ISSN 1682-8658 (Print)