Comparative evaluation of direct results of low anterior rectal resection with total mesorectumectomy using laparoscopic and laparotomic methods
A. V. Dmitriev,
Yu. V. Khoronko,
S. V. Pereskokov,
V. S. Groshilin,
M. A. Kozyrevskiy,
L. S. Afunts,
I. I. Kuznecov https://doi.org/10.31146/1682-8658-ecg-184-12-31-37
Abstract
Purpose of research. Evaluation of direct results of surgical treatment of patients with cancer localization in the middle and lower ampullary rectum using laparoscopic and open methods. Materials and methods: a retrospective analysis was performed on 221 patients who underwent anterior and low anterior rectal resection. Results. Independent risk factors for failure of low colorectal anastomosis were determined. Laparoscopic treatment of rectal cancer with total mesorectumectomy does not lead to an increase in the number of intra—and postoperative complications. Laparoscopic mesorectumectomy is a priority method in comparison with the open method of operation.
About the Authors
A. V. Dmitriev
Rostov State Medical University of the Russian Federation Ministry of Public Health
Russian Federation
Russian Federation
Andrei V. Dmitriev, Department of Surgical Diseases № 2, candidate of medical Sciences, assistant
st. Suvorova, 119, Rostov-on-Don, Rostov region, 344022
Yu. V. Khoronko
Rostov State Medical University of the Russian Federation Ministry of Public Health
Russian Federation
Russian Federation
Yury V. Khoronko, Department of Operative Surgery and Topographic Anatomy, Professor, MD
st. Suvorova, 119, Rostov-on-Don, Rostov region, 344022
S. V. Pereskokov
Rostov State Medical University of the Russian Federation Ministry of Public Health
Russian Federation
Russian Federation
Sergei V. Pereskokov, head of the surgical Department, Department of surgical diseases № 2, MD, associate professor
st. Suvorova, 119, Rostov-on-Don, Rostov region, 344022
V. S. Groshilin
Rostov State Medical University of the Russian Federation Ministry of Public Health
Russian Federation
Russian Federation
Vitaliy S. Groshilin, head of Department of surgical diseases № 2, Professor, MD
st. Suvorova, 119, Rostov-on-Don, Rostov region, 344022
M. A. Kozyrevskiy
Rostov State Medical University of the Russian Federation Ministry of Public Health
Russian Federation
Russian Federation
Mikhail A. Kozyrevskiy, Department of Operative Surgery and Topographic Anatomy, candidate of medical Sciences, assistant
st. Suvorova, 119, Rostov-on-Don, Rostov region, 344022
L. S. Afunts
Rostov State Medical University of the Russian Federation Ministry of Public Health
Russian Federation
Russian Federation
Liliya S. Afunts, Department of surgical diseases № 2, Post-graduate
st. Suvorova, 119, Rostov-on-Don, Rostov region, 344022
I. I. Kuznecov
Rostov State Medical University of the Russian Federation Ministry of Public Health
Russian Federation
Russian Federation
Igor I. Kuznecov, student
st. Suvorova, 119, Rostov-on-Don, Rostov region, 344022
References
1. Litvinova U. A., Muraviev A. V., Soloviev I. E. Morphological assessment of lateral edge of a resection as a factor of the forecast of local recurrence at a cancer of a rectum. Forecasting of recurrence of a tumor by means of an assessment of markers of a colorectal cancer. Oncological Coloproctology. 2014;3:17–22.
2. Kaprin A. D., Starinsky V. V., Petrova G. V. Malignant neoplasms in Russia in 2016. (morbidity and mortality). Moscow. MNIOI P. A. Herzen. Publ., 2017, 236 P.
3. Zakharchenko A. A., Solyanikov A. S., Vinnik Yu. S. Optimization of surgical treatment of patients with cancer of the distal colon in conditions of obturation colonic obstruction. Coloproctology. 2015;1(51):38–45.
4. Cherkasov M. F., Dmitriev A. V., Groshilin V. S., Pereskokov S. V., Melikova S. G. Experience of applying mechanical colorectal anastomosis after anterior and low anterior rectal resection. Coloproctology. 2017;4(62): 54–59.
5. Bonjer H.J., Deijen C. L., Abis G. A., et al. A randomized trial of laparoscopic versus open surgery for rectal cancer. N Engl J Med. 2015, no.372, pp.1324–1332.
6. Heald R.J., Husband E. M., Ryall R. D. Th e mesorectum in rectal cancer surgery–the clue to pelvic recurrence? Br J Surg. 1982. no.69, pp.613–616.
7. Ng, D.C., Co C. S., Cheung H. Y., Chung C. C., Li M. K. Th e outcome of laparoscopic colorectal resection in T4 cancer. Colorectal Dis. 2011. vol. 13, no. 10, pp. 349–352.
8. Ng S.S., Leung K. L., Lee J. F., et al. Long term morbidity and oncologic outcomes of laparoscopic assisted anterior resection for upper rectal cancer: ten-year results of a prospective, randomized trial. Dis Colon Rectum. 2009, no.52, pp.558–566.
9. Jeong S.Y., Park J. W., Nam B. H., et al. Open versus laparoscopic surgery for mid-rectal or lowrectal cancer after neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy (COREAN trial): survival outcomes of an open-label, non-inferiority, randomized controlled trial. Lancet Oncol. 2014. no.15, pp. 767–774.
10. Zorron R., Phillips H. N., Wynn G. et al. “Down-to-Up” transanal NOTES Total mesorectal excision for rectal cancer: Preliminary series of 9 patients. J Minim Access Surg. 2014. no.10, pp.144–150.
11. Zhu Q.L., Feng B., Lu A. G., et al. Laparoscopic low anterior resection for rectal carcinoma: complications and management in 132 consecutive patients. World J Gastroenterol. 2010;16(36): 4605–4610.
Review
For citations:
Dmitriev A.V., Khoronko Yu.V., Pereskokov S.V., Groshilin V.S., Kozyrevskiy M.A., Afunts L.S., Kuznecov I.I. Comparative evaluation of direct results of low anterior rectal resection with total mesorectumectomy using laparoscopic and laparotomic methods. Experimental and Clinical Gastroenterology. 2020;(12):31-37. (In Russ.) https://doi.org/10.31146/1682-8658-ecg-184-12-31-37
Views:
566
Email this article 